Skip to main content

Re-Branding "Women"? Another stupid idea takes hold

In the course of a day, I read some stupid stuff.  I read a lot of inspiring stuff, a lot of uplifting stuff, a lot of  mundane stuff.  But there is plenty of stupid stuff out there.

Today I read this:  Ads To Rebrand Girls

Yeah, apparently, we females aren't good enough on our own.  Major parts of the world  want to get rid of us before we're even born, and now even Americans are 'fessing up to the fact that they'd prefer a boy.  Fast Company thus asked some ad companies to give us - the fairer, weaker, less-wanted sex - a boost.  And the results are horrifying.  Click the link above to see for yourself.

Apparently, you should want a girl because she's funny and high-performing.  We live longer, so perhaps we'll be able to support you in your old age.  We're not very strong, but we are unique. Also, we don't tend to set things on fire. So there.  Have a girl;  they are a great "brand" of human.

What a bunch of hooey.  Hooey, I say.  All this does is make it - once more - a "one gender is inherently better than the other" argument.  And guess what?  One gender is NOT better than the other.  Different:  yes.  Better:  no.

Blessed John Paul the Great, in 1995, addressed this very topic (and trust me, his treatment is so much easier to swallow than those stupid ads referenced above).  He actually got to the heart of the matter: 


The Book of Genesis speaks of creation in summary fashion, in language which is poetic and symbolic, yet profoundly true: "God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them" (Gen 1:27). The creative act of God takes place according to a precise plan. First of all, we are told that the human being is created "in the image and likeness of God" (cf. Gen 1:26). This expression immediately makes clear what is distinct about the human being with regard to the rest of creation.

We are then told that, from the very beginning, man has been created "male and female" (Gen 1:27). Scripture itself provides the interpretation of this fact: even though man is surrounded by the innumerable creatures of the created world, he realizes that he is alone (cf. Gen 2:20). God intervenes in order to help him escape from this situation of solitude: "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him" (Gen 2:18). The creation of woman is thus marked from the outset by the principle of help: a help which is not one-sided but mutual. Woman complements man, just as man complements woman: men and women are complementary. Womanhood expresses the "human" as much as manhood does, but in a different and complementary way. (emphasis mine)

When the Book of Genesis speaks of "help", it is not referring merely to acting, but also to being. Womanhood and manhood are complementary not only from the physical and psychological points of view, but also from the ontological. It is only through the duality of the "masculine" and the "feminine" that the "human" finds full realization.

You see, "woman" doesn't make sense without "man".  There is a uniqueness and a complementarity that both express, but are made manifest wholly only with the other.

And the genius of women does NOT come at the detriment of men, or vice versa:

Necessary emphasis should be placed on the "genius of women", not only by considering great and famous women of the past or present, but also those ordinary women who reveal the gift of their womanhood by placing themselves at the service of others in their everyday lives. For in giving themselves to others each day women fulfill their deepest vocation. Perhaps more than men, women acknowledge the person, because they see persons with their hearts. They see them independently of various ideological or political systems. They see others in their greatness and limitations; they try to go out to them and help them. In this way the basic plan of the Creator takes flesh in the history of humanity and there is constantly revealed, in the variety of vocations, that beauty-not merely physical, but above all spiritual-which God bestowed from the very beginning on all, and in a particular way on women.

You know what's great about girls?  God made 'em.  And God made boys, so they are great too.  One gender is not a better "brand" than the other:  iPhone vs. Android,, Coke vs. Pepsi, Gucci vs. Chanel, Zelda vs. World of Warcraft.  Each gender is genius - made in the image and likeness of God, both meant to be celebrated, enjoyed, and encouraged to live to our fullest human potential.  Parents should treasure a boy OR a girl, love, play with, read to, discover, relate to, encounter, discipline and rejoice over each child, in HIS or HER singular expression of God's epitome of personhood and personality in the world.  A clear view of God's creation makes this definitive and certain.

We don't need an ad campaign to do that.

Comments

Post a Comment

I love comments, even if you don't agree, but please don't leave anonymous posts. A well-mannered reader leaves a name!

Popular posts from this blog

Trying to "end run" God

If you're a football fan, you know what an end run is. From Merriam-Webster:
a football play in which the ballcarrier attempts to run wide around the end of the line We try to "end run" God a lot. I do. I figure I know better. I've got this - no need to worry the Big Guy about such a trivial thing.

Of course, it never works.

Like the puppy above, when we try and evade the tough obstacle (even though we KNOW we will eventually have to do it), we end up - well, off in the bushes.

But oh! How I wished my way worked. I'd love to take a flying leap and land smoothly and gracefully. People would be in awe, as if watching Simone Biles nail a balance beam routine that no one else would even attempt. I would shyly look down and blush - just lightly - and acknowledge (But humbly! Oh so humbly!) my achievement.

But no: I am the one pulling myself out of the bushes, scratches all over my legs and twigs in my hair. I'd hear that gentle but loving voice of God saying, &quo…

So close to Jesus

This past Sunday, at Mass, Dear Husband and I had the great good fortune of having a dad, toddler and infant sit next to us in the front pew.

"Good fortune?" you say. Sounds horrible. Kids are so distracting. Put 'em in the nursery.

Nope. We sit up in the front pew, and always invite parents with young kids to come and sit with us. Having raised 5 hyper kids, we can pretty much ignore anything, plus kids do much better when they can see what's going on.

I have to admit, I wanted the toddler to act up a bit so I could whisper to the dad, "I'll watch the baby if you have to take him out."

Instead, we saw something rather remarkable.

Oh, the toddler (not quite 2) was a toddler. He was a bit anty. He wasn't quite sure that he liked seeing his mommy in front, cantoring, where he couldn't get to her. He whined and fussed a bit.

But during the Consecration, his enormous blue eyes locked onto the priest. That baby boy saw Jesus up there. You could just…

Fading Into Friday

It's been a long week. Monday was just ... bad. I ticked off our IT guy at work by opening up one of those d*%$ emails that as soon as you click on it, you think, "Oops." So I trotted over to his office, and he promptly yelled at me. Like I was a child. Or stupid. Or a stupid child.

This was after I found out that every imaginable driving route from my home to office and back home again is under construction. Can't get there from her. Orange barrels. Must as well sleep in the office.
This, combined with the fact that I am now the ONLY person on the planet who stills checks their blind spot before changing lanes, makes me want to quit my job and go live in a yurt.

Our health insurance company sent us these gloom and doom letters that Dear Hubby and I HAD to go online and fill out a health assessment NOW or OUR INSURANCE WOULD BE CANCELLED!!! They were SERIOUS! So, I went online Wednesday. Their system was down for maintenance.

Tried again yesterday. I swear I could n…