Today's choice is an excellent article about liturgical dance. But just to get us off to a silly start, please enjoy Stephen Colbert:
Now, back to reality: John J. Beuscher, in The Catholic World Report has written a fascinating historical overview of "liturgical dance". It's a great read. Here's just a bit of it:
One of the roots of
today’s liturgical dance lies in the revolt against spare Calvinist, Reformed
worship, which made itself felt in the late Romantic ambiance of 19th century
Europe. In Victorian and Edwardian England, this was manifested, among other
ways, in the art of the Pre-Raphaelites, in the antiquarian yearning for folk
and rustic forms of song, dance, and design, and in the self-conscious
decadence of Oscar Wilde. In the Anglican Church, it was manifested in
surprisingly widespread interest in the luxuriantly exotic, such as spiritualist
trance mediumship, occultism, and Theosophy.
But having once
tossed aside the sacraments and lost the primary sense of the Incarnation, it
was hard to get it back again. It seems to require (with Chesterton’s image in
mind) keeping a galloping team of horses from falling off either side of a
narrow ridge road. Losing the Incarnation means not knowing where to head. In
one church you have four bare white walls and entirely silent interior prayers,
without priest or ceremony. In the one next door, you have old guys dressed up
as they imagine Druid priests to have done, and cavorting with half-dressed
maenads, to the strains of “Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love comments, even if you don't agree, but please don't leave anonymous posts. A well-mannered reader leaves a name!